Lynn says, "My estimate of the probability of the coin landing on Heads must be the best, because 0.35 is greater than 0.32". Is she correct? Give a reason for your answer.

Lynn is incorrect. The reason is that the reliability of an experimental probability estimate depends on the number of trials performed. A larger number of trials generally leads to a more accurate and reliable estimate of the true probability. - Beth performed 125 spins. - Lynn performed 80 spins. Since 125 > 80, Beth's experiment has more trials. Therefore, Beth's relative frequency of 0.32 is a more reliable estimate of the probability of the coin landing on Heads, even though it is a smaller value than Lynn's.