For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 6Question 48
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    The law of obligationsThe law of obligationsBreach of contract
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 46)

    Section B - Scenario 1

    NovaStream Ltd is a tech startup developing AI software. On 1st May, NovaStream emails a supplier, DataCore, offering to buy 50 servers for £100,000, stating 'Please reply by 5th May'. On 2nd May, DataCore posts a letter accepting the offer. On 3rd May, NovaStream finds a cheaper supplier and emails DataCore revoking the offer. DataCore's letter of acceptance arrives on 6th May.

    Has a binding contract been formed between NovaStream Ltd and DataCore?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 48 · The law of obligations

    Section B - Scenario 1

    NovaStream Ltd is a tech startup developing AI software. They hire a freelance coder, Ben, to write a specific algorithm for £5,000, payable on completion. Ben completes 80% of the work but then abandons the project. NovaStream has to pay another coder £2,000 to finish the work.

    What is Ben entitled to claim under the contract?

    Answer options:

    A.

    £4,000, representing the 80% of the work he completed.

    B.

    £3,000, which is the contract price minus the cost of completion.

    C.

    Nothing, because the contract is an entire agreement and he has not substantially performed it.

    D.

    £5,000, as NovaStream can use the code he has already written.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the rule of entire obligations (Cutter v Powell) and consider if the exception of 'substantial performance' applies.

    Full Answer

    C.Nothing, because the contract is an entire agreement and he has not substantially performed it.✓ Correct
    The general rule (Cutter v Powell) is that if a contract requires entire performance, no payment is due until the work is completely finished. While the doctrine of 'substantial performance' (Hoenig v Isaacs) allows payment minus the cost of defects, abandoning a project at 80% is generally not considered substantial performance. Therefore, Ben is entitled to nothing.

    Common mistakes

    Assuming a pro-rata payment is automatically due for partial work.
    Question 47All questionsQuestion 49

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 6

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A In the context of the English legal system, which of the following statements accurate...MediumQ02Section A Which of the following courts binds the High Court but is NOT bound by its own previou...MediumQ03Section A In the context of the law of contract, which TWO of the following statements regarding...MediumQ04Section A Zephyr Ltd, a wind turbine manufacturer, promises to pay a £5,000 bonus to an independ...HardQ05Section A In the tort of negligence, which of the following best describes the 'Caparo test' for...Medium
    View all 60 questions →