For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 6Question 04
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    The law of obligationsThe law of obligationsConsideration

    ACCA · Question 04 · The law of obligations

    Section A

    Zephyr Ltd, a wind turbine manufacturer, promises to pay a £5,000 bonus to an independent contractor, Bolt, if Bolt completes the installation of a turbine by Friday. Bolt is already contractually bound to Zephyr Ltd to complete the installation by Friday for £20,000. Bolt completes the work on time, but Zephyr Ltd refuses to pay the £5,000 bonus.

    Under the rule in Williams v Roffey Bros, in which of the following circumstances would Bolt be entitled to the bonus?

    Answer options:

    A.

    If Bolt suffered a detriment in completing the work on time.

    B.

    If Zephyr Ltd obtained a practical benefit from Bolt completing the work on time.

    C.

    If Bolt had threatened to stop work unless the bonus was paid.

    D.

    Bolt is never entitled to the bonus as he is only performing an existing contractual duty.

    How to approach this question

    Identify the legal issue: consideration and existing contractual duties. Apply the exception established in Williams v Roffey Bros regarding practical benefit.

    Full Answer

    B.If Zephyr Ltd obtained a practical benefit from Bolt completing the work on time.✓ Correct
    The general rule (Stilk v Myrick) is that performing an existing contractual duty is not valid consideration for a new promise. However, Williams v Roffey Bros established that if the promisor gains a 'practical benefit' (e.g., avoiding a penalty clause to a third party) and there is no duress, the promise is binding.

    Common mistakes

    Applying the strict rule in Stilk v Myrick without considering the modern exception of practical benefit.
    Question 03All questionsQuestion 05

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 6

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A In the context of the English legal system, which of the following statements accurate...MediumQ02Section A Which of the following courts binds the High Court but is NOT bound by its own previou...MediumQ03Section A In the context of the law of contract, which TWO of the following statements regarding...MediumQ05Section A In the tort of negligence, which of the following best describes the 'Caparo test' for...MediumQ06Section A An employee of a delivery company, whilst on his delivery route, deviates 5 miles to v...Medium
    View all 60 questions →