For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4Question 47
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus BObligationsMTQ
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 46)

    SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

    Under contract law, whose terms govern the contract?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 47 · Corporate and Business Law

    SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

    Assume AeroLogistics' terms did apply. One term states: 'AeroLogistics accepts no liability whatsoever for damage to goods caused by our own negligence.' Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, is this clause valid in a business-to-business contract?

    Answer options:

    A.

    It is absolutely void and can never be enforced.

    B.

    It is automatically valid because it is a business-to-business contract.

    C.

    It is valid only if it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.

    D.

    It is valid only if Zenith signed the document in wet ink.

    How to approach this question

    Apply UCTA 1977 rules regarding the exclusion of liability for negligence causing property damage.

    Full Answer

    C.It is valid only if it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.✓ Correct
    Under Section 2 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, a business cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence (absolutely void). However, for other loss or damage (like property damage to machinery), a clause excluding liability for negligence is valid only if it satisfies the UCTA 'reasonableness' test.

    Common mistakes

    Thinking all exclusion clauses for negligence are void, confusing property damage with personal injury.
    Question 46All questionsQuestion 48

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01AgriGrow Ltd, a large-scale agricultural technology firm, is pursuing a complex breach of contrac...MediumQ02In the context of judicial precedent, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) is generally bound by ...MediumQ03Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what action must a UK court take if it finds that a piece of pri...MediumQ04QuantumLeap Tech, a startup, displays a highly specialized server rack on its website with a pric...MediumQ05A cross-border logistics company, TransGlobal Freight, urgently asks an independent consultant to...Hard
    View all 60 questions →