For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 3Question 55
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Syllabus F: Management, administration and the regulation of companiesSection BCorporate and Business Law

    ACCA · Question 55 · Syllabus F: Management, administration and the regulation of companies

    Scenario: Titanium Forge plc has three directors: Alan, Brenda, and Charles. Alan recently discovered a lucrative opportunity to supply steel to a new bridge project. Without telling the board, Alan set up his own company to take the contract. Brenda, the finance director, failed to notice that Titanium Forge was trading while insolvent for six months. Charles rarely attends board meetings.

    Which statutory duty has Alan breached by taking the bridge contract for his own company?

    Answer options:

    A.

    Section 171: Duty to act within powers.

    B.

    Section 174: Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence.

    C.

    Section 175: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest.

    D.

    Section 177: Duty to declare interest in proposed transaction or arrangement.

    How to approach this question

    Match the director's action (stealing a corporate opportunity) to the correct statutory duty.

    Full Answer

    C.Section 175: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest.✓ Correct
    Under s.175 of the Companies Act 2006, a director must avoid a situation in which they have a direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the interests of the company. This specifically applies to the exploitation of any property, information, or opportunity. Alan has breached this by taking the bridge contract for himself (similar to the case of IDC v Cooley).

    Common mistakes

    Confusing s.175 (general conflicts/opportunities) with s.177 (declaring an interest in a transaction with the company itself).
    Question 54All questionsQuestion 56

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 3

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01In the English legal system, which of the following accurately describes the difference between t...EasyQ02Which of the following courts is bound by the decisions of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)?MediumQ03When interpreting statutes, which rule allows a judge to consider the original common law defect ...MediumQ04A tech startup, CloudNova, advertises a new cloud storage package on its website for £10 per year...MediumQ05In contract law, past consideration is generally not valid. However, there are exceptions. Which ...Hard
    View all 60 questions →