For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 2Question 24
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate fraudulent and criminal behaviourSection ASyllabus HCorporate and Business Law

    ACCA · Question 24 · Corporate fraudulent and criminal behaviour

    Under the Bribery Act 2010, a commercial organization can be guilty of the strict liability offence of 'failure to prevent bribery'.

    Which TWO of the following statements regarding this offence are correct?

    Answer options:

    A.

    The organization can be liable if an associated person bribes another person intending to obtain or retain business for the organization.

    B.

    The prosecution must prove that the board of directors explicitly authorized the bribe.

    C.

    The organization has a defense if it can prove it had 'adequate procedures' in place to prevent bribery.

    D.

    The offence only applies if the bribery took place within the United Kingdom.

    How to approach this question

    Recall the elements of the s.7 corporate offence in the Bribery Act 2010. It is strict liability (no board approval needed) but has the 'adequate procedures' defense.

    Full Answer

    Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 creates a strict liability offence for commercial organizations that fail to prevent bribery by an 'associated person' (employee, agent, subsidiary) acting on their behalf. The only defense is for the organization to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that it had 'adequate procedures' in place designed to prevent such conduct.

    Common mistakes

    Believing that senior management must be aware of the bribe for the company to be liable. Section 7 was specifically designed to bypass the need to prove 'directing mind and will'.
    Question 23All questionsQuestion 25

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 2

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01A dispute has arisen between 'AquaHarvest Ltd' and a supplier over a £150,000 contract for specia...MediumQ02A judge is interpreting a 19th-century statute regarding 'carriages on the highway' to determine ...MediumQ03Under the Human Rights Act 1998, certain rights can be claimed by corporate entities as well as n...MediumQ04'AeroDyne Drone Logistics Ltd' sends an automated email to a potential client stating: "We can pr...EasyQ05'EcoVertical Farms Ltd' leases a warehouse from a landlord. During a severe economic downturn, th...Hard
    View all 60 questions →