For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 2Question 05
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    The law of obligationsSection ASyllabus BCorporate and Business Law

    ACCA · Question 05 · The law of obligations

    'EcoVertical Farms Ltd' leases a warehouse from a landlord. During a severe economic downturn, the landlord promises to halve the rent for a year. EcoVertical relies on this and invests its remaining cash into new LED lighting. When the economy improves six months later, the landlord demands the full arrears for the past six months.

    Under the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel, what is the likely outcome?

    Answer options:

    A.

    The landlord can claim the arrears because EcoVertical provided no consideration for the rent reduction.

    B.

    The landlord is estopped from claiming the arrears because EcoVertical relied on the promise to their detriment.

    C.

    The landlord can claim the arrears because promissory estoppel can only be used as a 'sword', not a 'shield'.

    D.

    The landlord is permanently estopped from ever raising the rent back to the original amount.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the principles of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd. Promissory estoppel acts as an equitable defense when a promise is relied upon.

    Full Answer

    B.The landlord is estopped from claiming the arrears because EcoVertical relied on the promise to their detriment.✓ Correct
    Promissory estoppel (established in the High Trees case) prevents a promisor from going back on their promise when the promisee has relied on it to their detriment, and it would be inequitable to allow the promisor to revert to strict legal rights. It acts as a 'shield' against the landlord's claim for arrears.

    Common mistakes

    Applying strict common law rules of consideration (Pinnel's Case) without recognizing the equitable exception of promissory estoppel.
    Question 04All questionsQuestion 06

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 2

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01A dispute has arisen between 'AquaHarvest Ltd' and a supplier over a £150,000 contract for specia...MediumQ02A judge is interpreting a 19th-century statute regarding 'carriages on the highway' to determine ...MediumQ03Under the Human Rights Act 1998, certain rights can be claimed by corporate entities as well as n...MediumQ04'AeroDyne Drone Logistics Ltd' sends an automated email to a potential client stating: "We can pr...EasyQ06A software developer creates an AI diagnostic tool for hospitals. Due to a negligent coding error...Medium
    View all 60 questions →