Medium1 markMultiple Choice
Area III: Performing ProceduresAUDConfirmationsEvidence

CPA · Question 24 · Area III: Performing Procedures

An auditor sends positive confirmation requests to a sample of customers. A customer responds stating, 'We do not owe $15,000; we paid this amount on December 28.' The auditor's client has a year-end of December 31. The auditor investigates and finds the check was received and deposited by the client on January 3. Which of the following is the MOST likely conclusion?

Answer options:

A.

The account is misstated because the cash was not in the bank at year-end.

B.

The exception is a timing difference and not a misstatement.

C.

This indicates a cutoff error; the client should have recorded the cash in December.

D.

This is a misappropriation of assets scheme (lapping).

How to approach this question

Analyze the timeline. Customer mailed 12/28. Client received 1/3. At 12/31, is it a Receivable? Yes. Did Customer think they paid? Yes. Result: Timing Difference.

Full Answer

B.The exception is a timing difference and not a misstatement.✓ Correct
Exceptions in confirmations often arise from timing differences (goods in transit, cash in transit). Since the client had not received the check by 12/31, the receivable was validly outstanding on the client's books.

Common mistakes

Assuming every exception is an error.

Practice the full CPA AUD Practice Exam 4

78 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam