Hard1 markMultiple Choice
Area II: Risk AssessmentAUDMaterialityPlanning

CPA · Question 12 · Area II: Risk Assessment

An auditor is determining performance materiality for the audit of a nonissuer. The auditor has established materiality for the financial statements as a whole at $500,000. The entity operates in a high-risk industry and has a history of numerous audit adjustments. Which of the following represents the MOST appropriate judgment for setting performance materiality?

Answer options:

A.

Set performance materiality at $450,000 (90% of overall materiality) to minimize the risk of over-auditing.

B.

Set performance materiality at $250,000 (50% of overall materiality) to create a safety buffer for aggregate uncorrected misstatements.

C.

Set performance materiality at $500,000 (100% of overall materiality) because the entity is a nonissuer.

D.

Set performance materiality at $10,000 (2% of overall materiality) to ensure all errors are found.

How to approach this question

Performance Materiality is a 'safety buffer'. Higher Risk = Bigger Buffer needed = Lower Performance Materiality number.

Full Answer

B.Set performance materiality at $250,000 (50% of overall materiality) to create a safety buffer for aggregate uncorrected misstatements.✓ Correct
Performance materiality is set at an amount less than overall materiality to reduce the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. For a client with high risk and a history of adjustments, the auditor should select a lower percentage (e.g., 50% rather than 75%) to provide a greater safety margin.

Common mistakes

Thinking 'High Risk' means 'High Materiality'. It's the opposite; high risk means we need to look closer (lower materiality threshold).

Practice the full CPA AUD Practice Exam 2

78 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam