Easy1 markShort Answer
Interpreting Results and Evaluating FindingsSpearman's RankCorrelationConclusionGCSE

AQA GCSE · Question 10.3 · Interpreting Results and Evaluating Findings

Write a possible conclusion to your hypothesis in part (a).

How to approach this question

1. **Recall the SRCC value**: The calculated value is 0.89. 2. **Interpret the SRCC value**: * The value is positive, so there is a positive correlation. * The value is close to +1 (a perfect positive correlation). A value of 0.89 is considered a **strong** positive correlation. 3. **Relate this back to the hypothesis**: The hypothesis in part (a) was that there would be a positive correlation. 4. **Formulate the conclusion**: State the strength and direction of the correlation found, and state that this supports the original hypothesis. For example: "The result of 0.89 shows a strong positive correlation, which supports the hypothesis."

Full Answer

To write a conclusion, we must interpret the calculated Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) of 0.89 in the context of the investigation. 1. **Strength and Direction**: An SRCC value can range from -1 to +1. * A value of +0.89 is positive and close to +1. This indicates a **strong positive correlation**. 2. **Context**: This strong positive correlation is between resting heart rate and finishing position number. This means that competitors with a higher resting heart rate tended to have a higher finishing position number (i.e., they finished the race more slowly). 3. **Link to Hypothesis**: The original hypothesis was that there would be a positive correlation. The result strongly supports this. **Conclusion**: The SRCC value of 0.89 indicates a strong positive correlation between resting heart rate and finishing position. This supports the initial hypothesis.

Common mistakes

✗ Just stating "positive correlation" without mentioning the strength (strong). ✗ Not linking the conclusion back to the context of the variables (heart rate and finishing position). ✗ Stating that correlation proves causation (e.g., "a high heart rate *causes* a bad finish"). Correlation does not imply causation.

Practice the full AQA GCSE Statistics Higher Tier Paper 1

42 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam