Lynn says, "My estimate of the probability of the coin landing on Heads must be the best, because 0.35 is greater than 0.32".
<br>
Is she correct? Give a reason for your answer.

Lynn is incorrect. In experimental probability, the reliability of an estimate increases with the number of trials conducted. A larger sample size is more likely to reflect the true underlying probability. Beth conducted 125 spins, while Lynn conducted only 80 spins. Since 125 > 80, Beth's experiment has more trials, and therefore her relative frequency of 0.32 is considered a more reliable estimate of the probability of the coin landing on Heads, even though Lynn's value of 0.35 is higher.