For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5Question 60
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Management, administration and the regulation of companiesSyllabus FDirectorsDisqualification
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 58)

    Section B - Scenario 5

    SCENARIO: 'EcoTransit Ltd' operates an electric scooter network. The company has been losing money for months. By 1st September, the directors realize there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation. However, they continue trading for another two months, ordering £50,000 of new scooters on credit. During this time, they also repay a £20,000 unsecured loan owed to the brother of one of the directors. The company finally enters insolvent liquidation on 1st November.

    QUESTION: By continuing to trade and incur debt after 1st September, what specific civil offense have the directors committed under the Insolvency Act 1986?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 60 · Management, administration and the regulation of companies

    Section B - Scenario 5

    SCENARIO: 'EcoTransit Ltd' operates an electric scooter network. The company has been losing money for months. By 1st September, the directors realize there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation. However, they continue trading for another two months, ordering £50,000 of new scooters on credit. During this time, they also repay a £20,000 unsecured loan owed to the brother of one of the directors. The company finally enters insolvent liquidation on 1st November.

    QUESTION: As a result of their conduct, the Secretary of State applies to have the directors disqualified under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 for 'unfit conduct' in relation to an insolvent company. What is the maximum period of disqualification the court can impose for this?

    Answer options:

    A.

    5 years

    B.

    10 years

    C.

    15 years

    D.

    Life

    How to approach this question

    Recall the maximum disqualification period under Section 6 of the CDDA 1986.

    Full Answer

    C.15 years✓ Correct
    Under Section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the court must make a disqualification order against a person if their conduct as a director of an insolvent company makes them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. The minimum period of disqualification is 2 years, and the maximum is 15 years.

    Common mistakes

    Confusing the 15-year maximum for unfit conduct with the 5-year maximum for persistent breaches of companies legislation.
    Question 59All questions

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A In the context of the English legal system, an AI ethics consultancy is appealing a de...MediumQ02Section A A statute regulating commercial drone flights was drafted in 2015. A new case involves...MediumQ03Section A Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what is the legal effect if a UK court finds that a p...MediumQ04Section A NovaTech Ltd offers to sell a batch of quantum processors to Q-Compute Plc. Q-Compute ...MediumQ05Section A During a severe economic downturn, a landlord agrees to accept half rent from a commer...Hard
    View all 60 questions →