For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1Question 56
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus FManagement and Administration
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 55)

    SCENARIO: BioHeal Pharmaceuticals Ltd is developing a new vaccine. David is a director of BioHeal. During a board meeting, David learns that a rival company is selling a patent that would perfectly complement BioHeal's research. BioHeal's board decides they cannot afford the patent. David secretly buys the patent himself through his own side business and later licenses it to other companies for a massive profit.

    Which statutory duty under the Companies Act 2006 has David most clearly breached?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 56 · Corporate and Business Law

    SCENARIO: BioHeal Pharmaceuticals Ltd is developing a new vaccine. David is a director of BioHeal. During a board meeting, David learns that a rival company is selling a patent that would perfectly complement BioHeal's research. BioHeal's board decides they cannot afford the patent. David secretly buys the patent himself through his own side business and later licenses it to other companies for a massive profit.

    Could David have legally pursued this opportunity without breaching his duties?

    Answer options:

    A.

    No, directors are strictly forbidden from ever having outside business interests.

    B.

    Yes, because the board had already rejected the opportunity.

    C.

    Yes, if he had fully disclosed it and obtained authorization from the independent directors.

    D.

    Yes, because he used his own money to buy the patent.

    How to approach this question

    Recall the mechanism for authorizing conflicts of interest under CA 2006.

    Full Answer

    C.Yes, if he had fully disclosed it and obtained authorization from the independent directors.✓ Correct
    Under s.175 CA 2006, a conflict of interest (like taking a corporate opportunity) is not a breach if the matter has been proposed to and authorized by the directors who do not have an interest in the matter. The fact that the company couldn't afford it does not automatically give David the right to take it secretly.

    Common mistakes

    Assuming that because the company rejected the opportunity, it was 'fair game'.
    Question 55All questionsQuestion 57

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Which of the following courts is bound by the decisions of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)?EasyQ02In the context of statutory interpretation, what is the 'mischief rule'?MediumQ03Which of the following statements regarding the Human Rights Act 1998 is correct?MediumQ04A shop displays a laptop in its window with a price tag of £50. The actual price is £500. A custo...EasyQ05Which of the following represents a valid exception to the rule that past consideration is no con...Medium
    View all 60 questions →