For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1Question 49
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus CEmployment Law

    ACCA · Question 49 · Corporate and Business Law

    SCENARIO: Harvest Horizon is an agri-tech firm. They hired Marcus as a drone operator. Marcus uses Harvest Horizon's drones, must wear their uniform, and is told exactly which fields to survey each day. However, his contract explicitly states: 'Marcus is an independent contractor and is responsible for his own tax.' Marcus has worked there for 3 years. Following a dispute over safety protocols, Harvest Horizon told Marcus not to return to work.

    Based on the multiple test, what is Marcus's likely employment status?

    Answer options:

    A.

    He is an independent contractor because the contract explicitly states so.

    B.

    He is an employee, because the reality of the relationship outweighs the label in the contract.

    C.

    He is a worker, but not an employee, because he operates machinery.

    D.

    He is an independent contractor because he is responsible for his own tax.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the multiple test to the facts, ignoring the contractual label.

    Full Answer

    B.He is an employee, because the reality of the relationship outweighs the label in the contract.✓ Correct
    Under the multiple (economic reality) test, factors such as Harvest Horizon providing the equipment (drones), dictating the work (control), and requiring a uniform indicate an employer-employee relationship. The courts will disregard a 'sham' label in a contract if it does not reflect the reality of the situation (Autoclenz v Belcher).

    Common mistakes

    Believing a signed contract stating 'independent contractor' is legally binding regarding status.
    Question 48All questionsQuestion 50

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Which of the following courts is bound by the decisions of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)?EasyQ02In the context of statutory interpretation, what is the 'mischief rule'?MediumQ03Which of the following statements regarding the Human Rights Act 1998 is correct?MediumQ04A shop displays a laptop in its window with a price tag of £50. The actual price is £500. A custo...EasyQ05Which of the following represents a valid exception to the rule that past consideration is no con...Medium
    View all 60 questions →