For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1Question 39
    Medium1 markMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection ASyllabus GInsolvency Law

    ACCA · Question 39 · Corporate and Business Law

    Under s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986, what is the standard used to judge whether a director should have known the company was facing unavoidable insolvent liquidation?

    Answer options:

    A.

    A purely subjective test.

    B.

    A purely objective test.

    C.

    An objective and subjective test.

    D.

    The test of absolute certainty.

    How to approach this question

    Identify the dual nature of the test for wrongful trading.

    Full Answer

    C.An objective and subjective test.✓ Correct
    The test for wrongful trading is both objective (what a reasonably diligent person carrying out those functions would know) and subjective (the actual knowledge, skill, and experience of that particular director).

    Common mistakes

    Thinking the test is only objective.
    Question 38All questionsQuestion 40

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 1

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Which of the following courts is bound by the decisions of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)?EasyQ02In the context of statutory interpretation, what is the 'mischief rule'?MediumQ03Which of the following statements regarding the Human Rights Act 1998 is correct?MediumQ04A shop displays a laptop in its window with a price tag of £50. The actual price is £500. A custo...EasyQ05Which of the following represents a valid exception to the rule that past consideration is no con...Medium
    View all 60 questions →