Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 21)

Section B - Case 2

PharmaNova is a pharmaceutical company with a financial year end of 31 December 20X5.
On 15 December 20X5, a patient filed a lawsuit against PharmaNova for $2 million, claiming side effects from a drug. Legal counsel advises there is a 60% probability PharmaNova will lose the case and have to pay the full $2 million.
On 28 December 20X5, the board decided to close a research facility. A detailed formal plan was drawn up, but it was not communicated to the affected employees until 5 January 20X6. The estimated closure costs are $500,000.
On 10 January 20X6, a major wholesale customer went bankrupt. The customer owed PharmaNova $300,000 at 31 December 20X5.
On 1 February 20X6, PharmaNova decided to change its inventory valuation method from FIFO to Weighted Average to better reflect its business model.

Question:
How should PharmaNova account for the lawsuit in its financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X5?

ACCA · Question 22 · IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets

Section B - Case 2

PharmaNova is a pharmaceutical company with a financial year end of 31 December 20X5.
On 15 December 20X5, a patient filed a lawsuit against PharmaNova for $2 million, claiming side effects from a drug. Legal counsel advises there is a 60% probability PharmaNova will lose the case and have to pay the full $2 million.
On 28 December 20X5, the board decided to close a research facility. A detailed formal plan was drawn up, but it was not communicated to the affected employees until 5 January 20X6. The estimated closure costs are $500,000.
On 10 January 20X6, a major wholesale customer went bankrupt. The customer owed PharmaNova $300,000 at 31 December 20X5.
On 1 February 20X6, PharmaNova decided to change its inventory valuation method from FIFO to Weighted Average to better reflect its business model.

Question:
What is the correct accounting treatment for the research facility closure costs in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X5?

Answer options:

A.

Recognize a provision for $500,000.

B.

No provision is recognized, but disclosure may be required as a non-adjusting event.

C.

Recognize a provision for $500,000 because the board decision was made before year-end.

D.

Recognize a contingent liability of $500,000.

How to approach this question

Recall the specific criteria for a restructuring provision under IAS 37. A board decision is not enough; there must be a constructive obligation created by communicating the plan to those affected before the reporting date.

Full Answer

B.No provision is recognized, but disclosure may be required as a non-adjusting event.✓ Correct
IAS 37 states that a constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan AND has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected. Since the announcement happened on 5 January 20X6, no constructive obligation existed at 31 December 20X5. Therefore, no provision can be recognized. It is treated as a non-adjusting event after the reporting period (IAS 10).

Common mistakes

Assuming a board decision before year-end is sufficient to recognize a provision.

Practice the full ACCA FR — Financial Reporting Practice Exam 5

32 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam